2. Problem Analysis
2.1 The Gallery System's Structural Failure
The contemporary art market operates through a concentration model that systematically excludes the majority of artists and audiences:
Geographic Concentration
New York, London, and Hong Kong account for 82% of global auction sales
Gallery representation clusters in 15 cities worldwide
95% of humanity has no access to contemporary art institutions
Economic Gatekeeping
Gallery representation requires existing wealth, social capital, and geographic privilege
The median professional artist earns €8,000-12,000 annually from art sales
Over 70% of art school graduates abandon artistic practice within 10 years, primarily for economic reasons
Speculation Dominance
Artworks function as financial instruments for wealth preservation and speculation
Aesthetic and cultural value subordinates to market performance
Secondary market dynamics create perverse incentives (artist death increases prices)
Circulation Constraints
Shipping costs: €5,000-50,000 per international exhibition
Insurance: 0.5-2% of declared value annually
Crating, customs, courier travel multiply expenses
Result: only wealthy institutions can program internationally
2.2 The NFT Experiment's Failure
The 2021-2022 NFT phenomenon tested blockchain's potential for art. It failed for structural reasons:
Financialization Over Function
NFT platforms optimized for trading volume, not cultural circulation. Royalty structures incentivized speculation. Platform fees extracted value without building lasting infrastructure.
Architectural Assumptions
ERC-721 and similar standards assume transferability as default. "Non-transferable" implementations fight the architecture rather than embody values. This creates perpetual tension between intent and infrastructure.
No Physical Connection
Digital-only focus ignored the embodied experience of art. The "metaverse" promised virtual galleries but delivered speculation on JPEGs.
Collapse
NFT trading volume fell 97% from peak. Major platforms face insolvency. The experiment demonstrated blockchain's potential while proving that speculative architecture serves speculation, not culture.
2.3 The Infrastructure Gap
Neither galleries nor NFT platforms solve the fundamental problem: permanent infrastructure for art to circulate independent of institutional gatekeepers, resistant to speculative capture, accessible regardless of geography or wealth.
This infrastructure must be:
Sovereign: Not dependent on external platform decisions
Anti-speculative: Architecturally, not just contractually
Sustainable: Self-funding through operation, not external subsidy
Accessible: Economically viable for hosts worldwide
Permanent: Designed for decades, not platform lifecycles
Last updated